12/27/2022 0 Comments Zettlr zettelkasten![]() I’m not saying that nothing interesting can come out of this line of questioning, but it seems like a designer question, something to wonder about when your job is to push the limits of what can be done. People look at a tool and ask themselves, “What can I do with it?”. But underlying her initial remark, I see a problem. In her case, the struggle produced something useful and clever: she imagined the Idea Compass, a series of prompts for coming up with ways to link your notes. In “The essence of the Zettelkasten method, demystified” for example, author Fei-Ling Tseng complains that the aforementioned method does not come with instructions – hence the need to “demystify” it. Second, I’ve read the following idea several times: people enthusiastically discover interrelated note-taking tools but quickly become disillusioned, because they struggle to make sense of them. Any new, supposedly definitive method seems to me like it tries to reinvent the wheel. David Allen’s Getting Things Done method outlined the elements of task management in such a definitive way (capture, process, create) that innovation now happens mostly at the margins. They touch on such fundamental issues that, essentially, their differences come down to marketing. Reading through some of these, I thought about two things.įirst, I think that most of these methods can be merged. Many authors took the opportunity to share their thoughts on the subject and I saw a bunch of articles on different methods: how to take notes, make links, manage writing projects, etc. The event was put under the umbrella of personal knowledge management (PKM). This week, there was an online conference on linked notes, the Linking Your Thinking Conference. This post is a translation of “Et toi, qu’est-ce que tu fiches ?” ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |